'the god delusion'
this is insane. not in the ludicrous, flipping out, 'cluck cluck gibber gibber your old man is a mushroom' but in the u have and simultaneously don't have a point...
before tackling this thesis into the existence or lack there of, of the deity that many have come to know as god, a certain someone is feeding me argumentative sound bites...
i am thankful for his quick reading pace as this means in a few days he will have completed the task that is dawkin and i will have a go.
i was in the frame of hang on here... what the hell? how can he? well maybe... and then the delusion was clarified.
we have sat for a period deliberating the first argument and out of the abyss that is the net, in sweeps a mail on the reasons why the attendance of worship is the nourishment of the spiritual self akin to the physical nourishment satisfied by food... this from someone who i haven't heard from in ages, out of the blue, no synchronisity wanting to be taken cognisance of between its arrival and our debate...
well i am not convinced that the presence of only texts precludes the possibility of a things existence, much the same as without its physical appearance in space and time precludes its existence. further i am anticipating the 'big bang singularity' to fall on its face with the mere choice to be persuaded by one and not the other as a counter to the others very existence...
fantastic! here comes kant, jurisprudence has served a purpose!
before tackling this thesis into the existence or lack there of, of the deity that many have come to know as god, a certain someone is feeding me argumentative sound bites...
i am thankful for his quick reading pace as this means in a few days he will have completed the task that is dawkin and i will have a go.
i was in the frame of hang on here... what the hell? how can he? well maybe... and then the delusion was clarified.
we have sat for a period deliberating the first argument and out of the abyss that is the net, in sweeps a mail on the reasons why the attendance of worship is the nourishment of the spiritual self akin to the physical nourishment satisfied by food... this from someone who i haven't heard from in ages, out of the blue, no synchronisity wanting to be taken cognisance of between its arrival and our debate...
well i am not convinced that the presence of only texts precludes the possibility of a things existence, much the same as without its physical appearance in space and time precludes its existence. further i am anticipating the 'big bang singularity' to fall on its face with the mere choice to be persuaded by one and not the other as a counter to the others very existence...
fantastic! here comes kant, jurisprudence has served a purpose!
Labels: dawkins, god, jurisprudence, kant
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home